<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Blind Leading The Blind.  The Debrief.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.implementingscrum.com/2007/12/12/the-blind-leading-the-blind-the-debrief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.implementingscrum.com/2007/12/12/the-blind-leading-the-blind-the-debrief/</link>
	<description>Starting Tough Conversations about Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mvizdos</title>
		<link>http://www.implementingscrum.com/2007/12/12/the-blind-leading-the-blind-the-debrief/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>mvizdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 08:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.implementingscrum.com/blog/2007/12/12/the-blind-leading-the-blind-the-debrief/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Thank you for the comment.  This is one of the main reasons I did add that section to the exercise -- it is eye opening for many people (especially groups I work with that are either brand new or in a public class where many people do not know one another).

Just don&#039;t play it up much the first time you do this and only point out -- through the questioning and debrief -- of what the team saw.   If they execute on it perfectly (and some &quot;get it&quot;)... ask... &quot;What could have gone wrong here.&quot;

And be quiet (smile).

- mike vizdos
    www.implementingscrum.com
    www.michaelvizdos.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thank you for the comment.  This is one of the main reasons I did add that section to the exercise &#8212; it is eye opening for many people (especially groups I work with that are either brand new or in a public class where many people do not know one another).</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t play it up much the first time you do this and only point out &#8212; through the questioning and debrief &#8212; of what the team saw.   If they execute on it perfectly (and some &#8220;get it&#8221;)&#8230; ask&#8230; &#8220;What could have gone wrong here.&#8221;</p>
<p>And be quiet (smile).</p>
<p>- mike vizdos<br />
    <a href="http://www.implementingscrum.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.implementingscrum.com</a><br />
    <a href="http://www.michaelvizdos.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelvizdos.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huygir</title>
		<link>http://www.implementingscrum.com/2007/12/12/the-blind-leading-the-blind-the-debrief/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>huygir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.implementingscrum.com/blog/2007/12/12/the-blind-leading-the-blind-the-debrief/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>I anticipated (through experience mostly) everything you said EXCEPT one thing... I never expected that you would see a &quot;team&quot; given directions to succeed as a &quot;team&quot; let blind members simply crash (and burn).  In hindsight, &quot;teams&quot; certainly do that all the time, but in general just the competitive nature of human beings would seem to be enough that they would work to &quot;win&quot; (and the goal was pretty clear).

I&#039;m looking forward to adding that 3rd part of the traditional exercise so that I can see this for myself.  It actually kind of concerns me.

Thanks, dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I anticipated (through experience mostly) everything you said EXCEPT one thing&#8230; I never expected that you would see a &#8220;team&#8221; given directions to succeed as a &#8220;team&#8221; let blind members simply crash (and burn).  In hindsight, &#8220;teams&#8221; certainly do that all the time, but in general just the competitive nature of human beings would seem to be enough that they would work to &#8220;win&#8221; (and the goal was pretty clear).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to adding that 3rd part of the traditional exercise so that I can see this for myself.  It actually kind of concerns me.</p>
<p>Thanks, dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
